ABSTRACT
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) can have manifestations closely mimicking autoimmune diseases. The prevalence of autoantibodies in TB varies among different populations. Objectives: To study the prevalence of anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational study. Subjects with microbiologically confirmed PTB, either via smear or culture positivity on sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, or positive rapid diagnostic tests were included. ANCA against proteinase-3 (PR3), myeloperoxidase (MPO), lactoferrin, and elastase were tested using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ANA was detected using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). Results: Eighty-nine subjects with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 28 (20–46) years, 67.4% males, were recruited. Eighty-one subjects had microbiological confirmation on sputum examination, and eight required examination of BAL fluid. Sera were drawn from 62 treatment-naïve subjects, the rest (27) were on antitubercular therapy (ATT). Eighty-six (96.6%) subjects tested positive for anti-elastase antibody, seven of which were also positive for anti-PR3. None were positive for anti-MPO and anti-lactoferrin. Six (6.7%) subjects tested positive for ANA. None of the subjects had features of underlying connective tissue disease or vasculitis. Conclusion: PTB patients showed a high prevalence of anti-elastase and a low prevalence of ANA and anti-PR3 antibodies. ANCA positivity should be interpreted with caution in TB endemic areas. The role of anti-elastase antibodies in differentiating TB from ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) needs further research.
Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Forecasting , Health Plan Implementation/trends , Humans , India , Leadership , Primary Health Care/trendsABSTRACT
Clinical details and present day problems encountered in 425 cases of falciparum malaria (PF) are reported. 10.11% had taken chloroquine prior to reporting to us. Parasitic count done in 23.05% cases lacked correlation with severity of disease. Pattern of fever varied markedly but 5.4% were afebrile throughout and presented only with bodyache and malaise. Apyrexial spell was noted in 5.64%. 28.70% had typical facial looks of anaemia and sallow complexion. Cerebral symptoms were noted in 3.05%. Other symptoms were severe headache 33.4%, pain abdomen 3.29%, gastroenteritis 5.64%, jaundice 2.58% and bronchitis in 7.50%. We encountered subconjunctival haemorrhages with purpura and/or urticaria in four cases, symptoms suggestive of shock lung in 3, pulmonary oedema in 2, severe anaemia (HB less than 4 g%) in seven pregnant ladies, extrapyramidal symptoms in follow up period in 5 and congenital malaria in 2 cases. 83.25% were cured with chloroquine and oxytetracycline. 8.47% (who deteriorated despite the above treatment) were treated with quinine for 6 days. 5.17% (with severe disease) were also given quinine as first line drug. 2.82% (unresponsive to chloroquine and oxytetracycline but with mild disease) were treated with pyrimethamine-sulphamezathine combination for 5 days. One case who did not respond to quinine was treated with quinidine. Recrudescence was seen in 3.67% of patients treated with chloroquine and oxytetracycline. There was no case with renal failure, haemolysis due to G6PD deficiency and black water fever. There was only one death (0.23%) in our series. Self-medication, haphazard therapy and the slogan "Fever may be malaria-take chloroquine" can lead to problems in falciparum malaria.